Back to blog

Fintech Under Pressure: JPMorgan Introduces Paid Access to Client Data

In the heart of Manhattan, a relatively subtle yet crucial moment recently took place, which could redefine the future of the American financial sector. JPMorgan Chase, the largest American bank by assets and deposits, announced the conclusion of historic agreements with all the major fintech intermediaries behind most of the third-party data requests in the country. Fintech Under Pressure: JPMorgan Introduces Paid Access to Client Data
American Open Banking

The conflict between banks and fintech startups over who should pay for access to client data has been ongoing for several years. However, the situation has now reached a point where we are witnessing the first compromise. JPMorgan will now start charging fees for API access to data, fundamentally changing the nature of open banking in the United States. "The contracts will make the open banking ecosystem safer and more sustainable, enabling clients to continue using their favorite financial products reliably and securely, and the market has functioned," said the bank’s spokesperson, Drew Pusateri.

jpm_us

Performance of JPMorgan Chase’s Stock Price Over the Last Five Years*

On the other hand, the situation should be viewed in a more complex manner – for the first time, banks are gaining real control over the data flows driving the fintech ecosystem.

From Regulation to Monetization

As mentioned above, JPMorgan did not arrive at this agreement by chance. Within the genesis of court proceedings, it is crucial to highlight the turning point in 2024 when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) adopted the so-called open banking rule, mandating banks to share data for free. However, after the arrival of Donald Trump’s administration, the situation drastically changed. In May 2025, the government requested a federal court to immediately revoke the rule. This step paved the way for a new market model where data is directly transformed into a commercial commodity. Following this, JPMorgan immediately announced its intention to charge fintech companies hundreds of millions of USD.

Long-Term Potential

Naturally, JPMorgan achieved its desired strategic solution. The bank gains a new, and most importantly, stable source of income outside traditional lending and investment banking – this time from data infrastructure. Access fees from large fintech firms could generate hundreds of millions of USD annually, while also allowing the bank to fund the development and maintenance of its API systems.

More importantly, JPMorgan is securing its position as a gateway to financial data, through which all leading fintech applications must pass. Last but not least, the bank has been performing well on the stock market; since the beginning of the new decade, it has seen stable stock price development, with the company’s value increase this year already over 25%.*

*Past data is not a guarantee of future returns.

Disclaimer! This marketing material is not and should not be construed as investment advice. Past data is not a guarantee of future returns. Investing in foreign currency may affect returns due to fluctuations. All securities transactions may lead to both gains and losses. Forward-looking statements represent assumptions and current expectations, which may not be accurate or may be based on the current economic environment, which may change. These statements do not guarantee future performance. InvestingFox is a trademark of CAPITAL MARKETS, o.c.p., a.s., regulated by the National Bank of Slovakia.

Sources:

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/14/jpmorgan-chase-fintech-fees.html

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/28/jpmorgan-fintech-middlemen-plaid-data-requests-taxing-systems.html

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/31/jpmorgan-1000th-branch-opening-expansion-plans.html

InvestingFox is a trademark of CAPITAL MARKETS, o.c.p., a.s., with its registered office at Slávičie údolie 106, Bratislava – Staré Mesto district, 811 02. The company is registered in the Commercial Register of the Municipal Court Bratislava III, Section: Sa, File No.: 4295/B, ID No.: 36 853 054, VAT No.: 2022505419.

CAPITAL MARKETS, o.c.p., a.s. is a securities dealer pursuant to Section 55(1) of Act No. 566/2001 Coll. on Securities and Investment Services and on Amendments to Certain Acts, as amended (hereinafter the “Securities Act”). On October 30, 2007, CAPITAL MARKETS, o.c.p., a.s. was granted, by Decision No. OPK-2297/2007 of the National Bank of Slovakia -PLP, a license to provide investment services pursuant to Section 54(2) in conjunction with Sections 59(2) and (3) of the Securities Act, which was extended in accordance with the provisions of the Securities Act by Decision No. OPK-1830/2008-PLP dated April 21, 2008, Decision No. OPK-11601-1/2008 dated January 28, 2009, Decision No. ODT-5059-3/2012 dated July 23, 2012, and Decision No. ODT-9332/2014-1 dated October 21, 2014.

Read more

Casey’s Beat Expectations, but Shares Plummeted: Strong Earnings Overshadowed by a Slowdown in Sales

Casey’s Beat Expectations, but Shares Plummeted: Strong Earnings Overshadowed by a Slowdown in Sales

Casey’s General Stores kicked off fiscal year 2027 with results that, at first glance, appear very impressive. However, behind the strong numbers lies a story that is significantly more complex and raises more questions than clear answers for investors. The market isn’t just looking at how much the company earned, but also at how it achieved this result and whether it will be able to maintain a similar pace in the coming quarters.

The End of Visionary Dreams: In Autonomous Transportation, It’s No Longer the Cars That Matter, but Logistics

The End of Visionary Dreams: In Autonomous Transportation, It’s No Longer the Cars That Matter, but Logistics

Waymo has entered a phase where it’s no longer just about whether an autonomous car can safely navigate a city. What matters most is how many vehicles the company can deploy, how quickly it can enter new markets, and whether it can keep costs under control in the process. This is precisely where a technological demonstration differs from the real transportation business.

DICK’S Sporting Goods Lost 31% in a Single Day: Foot Locker Goes from a Big Bet to a Big Problem

DICK’S Sporting Goods Lost 31% in a Single Day: Foot Locker Goes from a Big Bet to a Big Problem

DICK’S Sporting Goods released results that, at first glance, appear very impressive. However, behind the significant growth lies a story that is considerably more complex and far less reassuring for investors. Some figures suggest that the company’s major strategic bet is not yet unfolding as expected. The market reacted extremely sharply to this news, and DICK’S Sporting Goods shares plummeted 30.7% to $124.31 following the results, marking the worst trading day in the company’s history.*

Applied Materials Breaks Records, but Shares Fall: Even the Strong AI Boom Is No Longer Enough for Investors

Applied Materials Breaks Records, but Shares Fall: Even the Strong AI Boom Is No Longer Enough for Investors

Applied Materials kicked off earnings season in a way that, at first glance, seems almost flawless. The numbers show strength across the entire business, the outlook suggests the pace may not slow down, and management speaks of demand that extends beyond the usual planning horizon. Despite this, the market reacted to the earnings release in a way that went against most investors’ expectations. [1]